<?xml version="1.0" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Rediscovering Worship - Topic: Book Review: <em>Recovering Mother Kirk</em></title>
	<link>http://rediscoveringworship.com/sf-forum/rcovering-mother-kirk-the-case-for-liturgy-in-the-reformed-tradition/book-review-recovering-mother-kirk</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Let us worship God . . . with reverence and awe. - Hebrews 12.28]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Forum Version 3.0.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://rediscoveringworship.com/sf-forum/?rcovering-mother-kirk-the-case-for-liturgy-in-the-reformed-tradition&#38;book-review-recovering-mother-kirk&#38;xfeed=topic" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>John Allen T. Bankson on Book Review: <em>Recovering Mother Kirk</em></title>
	<link>http://rediscoveringworship.com/sf-forum/rcovering-mother-kirk-the-case-for-liturgy-in-the-reformed-tradition/book-review-recovering-mother-kirk/page-1/post-22/#p22</link>
	<category>Recovering Mother Kirk: The Case for Liturgy in the Reformed Tradition</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rediscoveringworship.com/sf-forum/rcovering-mother-kirk-the-case-for-liturgy-in-the-reformed-tradition/book-review-recovering-mother-kirk/page-1/post-22/#p22</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>Reformed worship is, by definition, liturgical.  Presbyterians, by definition, cannot be evangelicals.  Presbyterianism is a churchly tradition, believing that such things as church membership, baptism, the Lord&#8217;s Supper, and corporate worship are central, not ancillary, to the Christian faith.<br />
These are the contentions of Westminster Seminary (California) Church History professor Darryl Hart in his book <em>Recovering Mother Kirk: The Case for Liturgy in the Reformed Tradition</em>.  Hart presents the connection between Reformed theology, worship, and polity, and explains how Presbyterianism in the U.S. became enamored of revivalism (beginning with Whitefield), a courtship which, ultimately, left Presbyterians with worship that no longer flowed from either their theology or their polity.  The fact that Hart&#8217;s main points, as outlined in the opening paragraph of this review, will raise eyebrows if not vehement denials from many Presbyterians today, only proves Hart&#8217;s thesis.</p>
<p>Read more . . .</p>

]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 19:07:38 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>