<?xml version="1.0" ?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
<channel>
	<title>Rediscovering Worship - Group: Articles</title>
	<link>http://rediscoveringworship.com/sf-forum/?group=2</link>
	<description><![CDATA[Let us worship God . . . with reverence and awe. - Hebrews 12.28]]></description>
	<generator>Simple:Press Forum Version 3.0.3</generator>
	<atom:link href="http://rediscoveringworship.com/sf-forum?group=2&#38;xfeed=group" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
<item>
	<title>John Allen T. Bankson on Hymnody Debate: Keep the Facts Historically Accurate</title>
	<link>http://rediscoveringworship.com/sf-forum/hymnody-debate-keep-the-facts-historically-accurate/hymnody-debate-keep-the-facts-historically-accurate/page-1/post-12/#p12</link>
	<category>Hymnody Debate:  Keep the Facts Historically Accurate</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rediscoveringworship.com/sf-forum/hymnody-debate-keep-the-facts-historically-accurate/hymnody-debate-keep-the-facts-historically-accurate/page-1/post-12/#p12</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>When I first weighed in on the discussion of church music on <em>PCANews</em>, I intended to post <a href="/hymnody-a-question-of-propriety/">only one editorial</a>. I have no doubt that popular sentiment among Evangelicals is squarely in the pop-idiom camp, so I was not surprised at the recent spate of letters all touting the merits of employing pop music in the church&#8217;s worship. I had decided not to post a follow-up letter because I figured the average reader had long since tired of this interchange. However, a recent comment from a reader prompts me to send in this plea for truthfulness in all our discussions.<br />
A Mr. McClelland states in his letter: &#8220;Wonder what Martin Luther was thinking as he sat in his favorite &#8216;Gasthaus&#8217; and heard a familiar beer song that became the tune to his &#8216;Ein Feste Burg&#8217;?&#8221; I don&#8217;t know what source McClelland consulted for this bit of information, but as I stated previously, it simply is not true. The &#8220;Luther used drinking songs as a source of tunes&#8221; legend has been a favorite of advocates of pop music in churches for the past 25 years or more, but there is not a shred of evidence to back it up. This story has become as prevalent as the infamous <a href="http://www.fcc.gov/mb/enf/forms/rm-2493.html">Madalyn Murray O&#8217;Hair petition</a> and is just as illegitimate.</p>
<p>Read more . . .</p>

]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:26:36 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>John Allen T. Bankson on Hymnody:  A Question of Propriety</title>
	<link>http://rediscoveringworship.com/sf-forum/hymnody-a-question-of-propriety/hymnody-a-question-of-propriety/page-1/post-11/#p11</link>
	<category>Hymnody:  A Question of Propriety</category>
	<guid isPermaLink="true">http://rediscoveringworship.com/sf-forum/hymnody-a-question-of-propriety/hymnody-a-question-of-propriety/page-1/post-11/#p11</guid>
	<description><![CDATA[<p>In our circles, much has been written about &#8220;Indelible Grace&#8221; in recent years.  A while back on the old <em>PCA News</em> web site, Kevin Twit (the founder of Indelible Grace Music) had quite a few things to say about church music.  At the prompting of many, I felt compelled to respond to some of the points raised in Twit&#8217;s article and some raised in one of the subsequent responses to it.<br />
I have no doubt that Twit is sincere in his desire to improve the state of congregational singing. That is a lofty and important task. I also applaud his commitment to hymns, whose theological depth the church desperately needs in these superficial, pluralistic times. However, I disagree with many of his assertions.</p>
<p>Read more . . .</p>

]]></description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 20 Apr 2008 21:19:43 -0400</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>